Insurance Licensing Background Checks in 2026: State Requirements, NIPR Process, Compliance Risks and Best Practices for Agencies

Insurance licensing background checks are regulatory screenings used by state Departments of Insurance to verify an applicant’s eligibility to hold an insurance producer license. Background checks typically review criminal history, financial responsibility, prior regulatory actions, and identity verification records. Most states require fingerprint-based checks that are submitted to state authorities and the FBI as part of the licensing process.

Regulators require insurance licensing background checks to protect consumers and maintain trust in the insurance marketplace. Because producers handle financial transactions and sensitive client data, state regulators must confirm that license applicants meet statutory character and integrity requirements before allowing them to sell insurance products.

The process itself varies significantly across states. Some jurisdictions require electronic fingerprinting through approved vendors, while others rely on disclosure reviews or criminal database checks. Most applications are submitted through the National Insurance Producer Registry (NIPR), which connects licensing applicants with state regulatory systems and initiates background screening workflows.

For agencies and carriers, these checks have direct operational implications. Background screening delays can slow producer onboarding. Missing disclosures can create compliance exposure. Inconsistent tracking across states can complicate licensing audits. Organizations that manage multi-state producer networks must treat insurance licensing background checks as a core component of licensing compliance and operational readiness.

Why Background Checks Are a Regulatory Gatekeeper in Insurance

Insurance licensing background checks function as a regulatory gatekeeper because they determine whether an applicant meets the character, integrity, and financial responsibility standards required to hold an insurance license. State Departments of Insurance use these screenings to evaluate whether producers can legally sell insurance products and handle consumer financial information. Without this screening step, regulators would have limited ability to prevent individuals with misconduct histories from entering the insurance marketplace.

Consumer Protection and Public Trust

Insurance producers advise clients on financial protection, retirement products, healthcare coverage, and property risk. Because producers collect premiums and access sensitive personal information, regulators require insurance licensing background checks to protect policyholders from fraud, financial abuse, or unethical conduct.

Consumer protection is a core mandate of state insurance regulation. Organizations such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) establish model regulatory standards to help states maintain consistent oversight of licensed insurance professionals. These standards reinforce the expectation that producers demonstrate honesty, reliability, and professional conduct before receiving a license.

Regulatory Integrity and Market Confidence

State insurance markets depend on public confidence. Licensing requirements, including insurance regulatory screening, help maintain the integrity of the producer workforce. Background checks allow regulators to confirm that individuals entering the industry meet statutory eligibility standards and do not pose a risk to consumers or insurers.

The licensing process is often administered through the National Insurance Producer Registry (NIPR), which connects applicants with state licensing systems and facilitates regulatory review. By centralizing application submissions and regulatory data exchange, the NIPR license process helps states conduct consistent licensing eligibility reviews.

Fraud and Misconduct Prevention

Insurance regulators also use background checks to detect prior fraud, financial crimes, or misconduct that may affect an applicant’s suitability for licensure. Criminal history insurance license reviews examine felony convictions, financial crimes, and other offenses related to dishonesty or breach of trust.

For agencies and carriers, these screenings serve as an early warning system. Identifying issues during the licensing stage helps organizations avoid onboarding producers who may later create compliance risks or reputational exposure.

Financial Responsibility Screening

Many state insurance background checks also evaluate financial responsibility indicators such as bankruptcies, tax liens, and civil judgments. Regulators review these records to assess whether an applicant demonstrates financial reliability when managing client transactions.

While financial issues do not automatically disqualify an applicant, regulators may request additional disclosures or documentation to evaluate whether the individual can responsibly handle insurance-related financial activities.

Key Takeaways

• Insurance licensing background checks help regulators verify producer integrity and eligibility before licensing approval.
• Consumer protection remains the primary reason states conduct criminal history insurance license screenings.
• Regulatory oversight frameworks developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners support consistent producer licensing standards.

Early background screening helps agencies identify compliance risks before onboarding new producers.

What Do Insurance Licensing Background Checks Review?

Insurance licensing background checks review criminal history, financial responsibility, regulatory conduct history, and identity verification. Although the exact criteria vary by state, most background checks follow a similar framework when evaluating producer licensing applications.

Criminal History Review

A criminal history insurance license review evaluates prior convictions that could affect eligibility to hold an insurance license. Most states require applicants to disclose criminal history as part of the licensing application, and fingerprint-based checks allow regulators to verify those disclosures.

Regulators typically review:

• Felony convictions, financial crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, or identity theft
• Misdemeanor offenses related to dishonesty or breach of trust
• Pending criminal charges may affect licensing eligibility
• Failure to disclose prior convictions during the application process

Not every criminal record results in a license denial. However, undisclosed convictions can create producer licensing compliance issues and lead to application delays or disciplinary review.

Financial Responsibility Review

Financial background reviews may include:

• Personal or business bankruptcies
• Outstanding tax liens
• Civil judgments related to financial disputes
• Patterns of unpaid debt or collections

A bankruptcy or financial hardship does not automatically prevent licensing. However, regulators may request additional explanations or documentation during the licensing eligibility review process.

Regulatory and Professional Conduct History

Regulators look for disciplinary actions that indicate prior misconduct within the insurance or financial services industry.

These reviews often examine:

• Prior insurance license revocations or suspensions
• Regulatory enforcement actions from state Departments of Insurance
• Disciplinary actions involving financial advisors or securities licenses
• Administrative penalties or regulatory investigations

State regulators may consult national producer databases during this stage to identify past enforcement actions that affect the applicant’s licensing eligibility.

Identity Verification and Fingerprinting

Many states require fingerprinting insurance license applicants as part of the background screening process. Fingerprints are typically submitted through approved electronic fingerprint vendors and transmitted to criminal databases for review.

Fingerprinting requirements usually involve:

• Electronic fingerprint submission through approved vendors
• Transmission of prints to state criminal databases
• Checking fingerprint records with the FBI for national criminal screening
• Verification of identity to prevent application fraud

Fingerprint-based background checks provide regulators with a reliable way to confirm an applicant’s identity and detect criminal history across jurisdictions.

Breakdown of the NIPR Background Check Process

Most applicants submit their licensing application through the National Insurance Producer Registry (NIPR), which transmits information to the appropriate state Department of Insurance for review.

Although the exact workflow varies by state, most insurance licensing background checks follow a structured sequence that combines application review, fingerprinting, criminal history screening, and regulatory database verification.

Application Submission via NIPR

The process typically begins when an applicant submits a licensing application through the NIPR platform. During this stage, the applicant provides personal information, licensing history, and required disclosures related to criminal history, regulatory actions, or financial responsibility.

Key elements collected include:

• Applicant identification information
• National Producer Number (NPN) if previously assigned
• License type and lines of authority requested
• Criminal history disclosures
• Financial responsibility disclosures

Once submitted, the application is transmitted to the appropriate state Department of Insurance for the next phase of the licensing eligibility review.

Fingerprinting and Vendor Submission

Many states have a fingerprinting requirement for an insurance license as part of the background check process. Fingerprints are typically captured electronically through approved fingerprint vendors.

This generally includes:

• Scheduling an appointment with a state-approved fingerprint vendor (e.g. FieldPrint or IdentoGo)
• Electronic fingerprint capture
• Submission of prints to state criminal databases
• Routing of fingerprint records to federal criminal databases

Fingerprinting helps regulators verify identity and detect criminal history records.

Timeline: Fingerprint appointments are usually completed within 1 to 3 days, but processing time varies depending on the state vendor.

State Department of Insurance Review

After receiving the application and fingerprint data, the State Department of Insurance begins its regulatory review. Licensing analysts verify that the application is complete and that all required disclosures have been submitted.

During this stage, regulators evaluate:

• Disclosure accuracy
• Licensing prerequisites such as education or exam completion
• Eligibility for the requested lines of authority
• Potential conflicts with prior regulatory actions

If information appears incomplete or inconsistent, regulators may request additional documentation from the applicant.

Timeline: Initial application review generally takes 3 to 7 business days, depending on application volume.

FBI and Criminal Database Screening

Once fingerprints are submitted, criminal history checks are conducted through national databases, including those maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. These checks help regulators identify criminal records that may not appear in state-level databases.

This stage of insurance regulatory screening may identify:

• Felony convictions
• Financial crimes
• Identity theft or fraud records
• Pending criminal cases

If the screening identifies a record, regulators may request supporting documentation or clarification before proceeding with the application.

Timeline: Federal background screening typically takes 3 to 10 days, depending on processing queues.

Producer Database Query

The applicant’s record may be checked against producer databases maintained by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

These databases allow regulators to detect:

• Prior license suspensions or revocations
• Disciplinary actions from other states
• Previous licensing denials
• Administrative enforcement actions

This supports multi-state licensing compliance by allowing regulators to review an applicant’s professional history across jurisdictions.

Timeline: Database queries usually occur automatically during the application review process.

H3: Approval, Conditional Approval or Denial

After completing the background review, the State Department of Insurance determines whether the applicant meets the statutory requirements for licensure.

Possible outcomes include:

• License approval when the applicant meets all regulatory requirements
• Conditional approval requiring additional documentation or monitoring
• Application delay while regulators investigate disclosures
• License denial if the applicant fails to meet statutory standards

For most applicants without disclosure issues, the entire insurance licensing background check process typically takes 7 to 14 business from application submission to approval. However, processing times vary across states. For example, Washington’s processing time is currently over 30 days.

Key Takeaways

• The NIPR platform serves as the primary gateway for submitting insurance licensing applications.
• Fingerprinting applicants allows regulators to conduct criminal history screening through state and federal databases.
• State Departments of Insurance conduct the final licensing eligibility review after background screening is complete.
• National regulatory databases help detect prior disciplinary actions across jurisdictions.
• Background check delays often occur when disclosures are incomplete, or fingerprint records are delayed.

Do All States Require Fingerprinting and Background Checks?

No, not all states require fingerprinting for insurance licensing background checks, but most states conduct some form of regulatory screening before issuing an insurance producer license.

Requirements vary widely across jurisdictions. Some states mandate fingerprint-based criminal background checks, while others rely primarily on disclosure reviews or database searches when evaluating licensing eligibility.

Because state insurance background check requirements differ, agencies must track these rules carefully to maintain multi-state licensing compliance.

Resident vs Non-Resident Background Check Rules

Resident licensing applications usually trigger the most comprehensive screening requirements. When an individual applies for a resident producer license, the State Department of Insurance often requires fingerprint submission and a full criminal history insurance license review.

Non-resident licensing applications are frequently handled differently. Many states rely on reciprocity rules that allow them to accept the background check performed by the applicant’s resident state. In these cases, additional fingerprinting may not be required.

However, reciprocity does not always eliminate screening requirements. Some states still conduct supplemental reviews or database checks before granting a non-resident license.

States with Mandatory Fingerprinting

Many states require electronic fingerprinting insurance license applicants during the initial licensing process. These fingerprints are typically submitted through approved vendors and routed to criminal databases for screening. However, fingerprinting rules can change from year to year. Check with the state department directly to confirm the current fingerprinting requirements.

Some states that require fingerprint-based background checks include:

• Alaska
• California
• Florida
• Georgia
• Texas
• New York
• Illinois
• Pennsylvania
• New Jersey
• Washington

These states often require fingerprint submission before a licensing application can be fully processed.

Disclosure-Based Screening States

Other states rely on disclosure requirements instead of mandatory fingerprinting. In these jurisdictions, applicants must disclose criminal history and regulatory actions on the licensing application.

Some states that do NOT require fingerprinting include:

• Colorado
• Connecticut
• Indiana
• Maine
• Nebraska

Regulators may still verify disclosures through:

• Criminal database searches
• Regulatory history reviews
• National producer database queries
• Financial responsibility checks

If an applicant reports a criminal history issue, the State Department of Insurance may initiate a more detailed licensing eligibility review. Note that fingerprinting requirements may change at any time and should be confirmed with the relevant state department.

Reciprocity and Waiver Situations

Reciprocity agreements between states may waive duplicate background screening requirements for producers applying for non-resident licenses. When a producer already holds an active license in good standing in their resident state, other states may accept that state’s background check and regulatory screening.

However, reciprocity rules do not apply uniformly across all jurisdictions. Certain states still require additional documentation or regulatory verification even when reciprocity exists.

Renewal Requirements

Most states do not require a new fingerprint-based background check during license renewals. Instead, regulators rely on continuing disclosure requirements and regulatory monitoring to detect misconduct after the initial license approval.

Producers are typically required to report:

• New criminal convictions
• Regulatory disciplinary actions
• Financial responsibility issues

Failure to disclose these events can create producer licensing compliance problems during license renewals or regulatory audits.

Compliance Alert!

Don’t assume that background check requirements automatically transfer across states. Some states still conduct independent eligibility reviews even when reciprocity exists. Agencies that manage multi-state producer networks should verify each jurisdiction’s fingerprinting and disclosure rules before submitting licensing applications to avoid delays in the NIPR background check process.

What Happens If a Background Check Flags an Issue?

If an insurance licensing background check flags an issue, the State Department of Insurance does not automatically deny the application. Instead, regulators initiate a deeper review.

For agencies and onboarding teams, this step can introduce delays that disrupt hiring timelines and slow producer onboarding.

Application Delay During Regulatory Review

The most common outcome when an issue appears during insurance licensing background checks is a temporary application hold. Regulators pause the licensing process while they evaluate the flagged record and request additional documentation from the applicant.

Common triggers for application delays include:

• Undisclosed criminal convictions
• Discrepancies between disclosure responses and criminal records
• Unresolved regulatory actions in another state
• Incomplete fingerprint submissions

During this review period, the producer cannot legally transact insurance business.

Typical delay window: 1–4 weeks depending on the complexity of the issue and individual state processing timelines.

Additional Documentation Requests

When regulators identify a potential concern, they usually request supporting documentation before making a licensing decision.

Agencies may be asked to provide:

• Court records related to criminal convictions
• Written explanations of past incidents
• Documentation confirming probation or restitution completion
• Evidence of financial responsibility following bankruptcy

Providing documentation quickly can shorten the insurance regulatory screening timeline.

Disclosure Investigations

Failure to disclose a criminal charge often triggers the most serious regulatory response. Most licensing applications require applicants to answer detailed disclosure questions regarding criminal convictions, regulatory actions, and financial events.

If the background check reveals an undisclosed event, regulators may investigate whether the omission was intentional.

Possible outcomes include:

• Additional investigation by licensing analysts
• Administrative penalties
• Extended licensing review periods
• Potential license denial

For agencies, undisclosed violations can create producer licensing compliance risks, especially if the individual has already been onboarded internally.

Conditional Licensing Decisions

In some cases, regulators approve a license but attach conditions to the approval. Conditional licensing allows the applicant to work as a producer while regulators monitor certain risk factors.

Examples of conditional approval include:

• Probationary licensing periods
• Restrictions on specific lines of authority
• Enhanced disclosure monitoring
• Additional reporting requirements

Conditional approvals often occur when an applicant demonstrates rehabilitation following a past issue.

Possible License Denial

If regulators determine that an applicant poses a risk to consumers or violates statutory eligibility requirements, they may deny the license.

Denial decisions often involve:

• Serious financial crimes
• Fraud or identity theft convictions
• Repeated regulatory violations
• Failure to disclose material information during the application

Applicants usually have the right to appeal the decision through the state’s administrative process.

Real-World Agency Example

Consider a regional agency onboarding 25 new producers across six states ahead of the annual enrollment season.

During the NIPR background check process, one producer’s fingerprint screening reveals a misdemeanor fraud conviction from several years earlier that was not disclosed on the application.

The state regulator pauses the application and requests:

• Certified court records
• A written explanation from the applicant
• Documentation showing the case was resolved

Because the agency discovers the issue early, the producer provides the documentation quickly and the regulator approves the license after a two-week delay.

Without proactive follow-up, the licensing delay could have pushed the onboarding timeline back by a full month.

Key Takeaways

• Most issues flagged during insurance licensing background checks trigger additional regulatory review rather than automatic denial.
• Failure to disclose criminal history creates the most serious licensing compliance risk.
• Documentation requests are common and can extend licensing timelines by weeks.
• Conditional licensing approvals may allow producers to work while regulators monitor compliance.

Agencies should monitor background check status closely to prevent onboarding delays.

Manual Tracking vs. Automated Background Compliance

Agencies can track insurance licensing background checks manually through spreadsheets and email follow-ups, or they can manage compliance through centralized systems that monitor licensing and regulatory screening across multiple states. Manual processes can work for small agencies with limited licensing activity, but they quickly become difficult to manage as operations expand. When agencies rely on manual tracking, licensing teams must monitor background check status, fingerprint submissions, and disclosure documentation across multiple systems. This process becomes increasingly complex when onboarding producers in several states at the same time.

Comparison: Manual vs Automated Background Compliance

Factor	Manual Process	Automated System
Tracking status visibility	Limited	Real-time dashboard
Document storage	Disorganized	Centralized repository
Multi-state rule updates	Manual research	Automated alerts
Audit readiness	Reactive	Audit-ready logs
Risk exposure	High	Reduced

Manual tracking creates operational blind spots. Licensing teams store fingerprint confirmations in one spreadsheet, disclosure documentation in email threads, and regulatory correspondence in shared folders. When background check requirements differ across states, staff must research state insurance background check requirements manually before submitting applications.

For agencies onboarding producers across several states, the complexity grows. Consider an agency hiring 15 producers across eight states within a single quarter. Each producer may require:

• Background check submission
• Fingerprinting insurance license verification
• Disclosure documentation review
• Regulatory correspondence with State Departments of Insurance

Tracking these tasks manually involves multiple spreadsheets, carrier portals, and email chains. If any step is missed, the producer’s license application may stall during the NIPR background check process, delaying onboarding.

Automated compliance systems address this issue by consolidating licensing and regulatory screening data into a centralized platform. Because multi-state licensing compliance requires monitoring different regulatory rules, automated alerts help licensing teams stay informed when background check requirements change or when a state requests additional documentation.

From an operational perspective, the biggest benefit is onboarding speed. When background compliance tracking is automated, agencies can process licensing applications more efficiently and reduce the time producers wait before becoming fully authorized to sell insurance products.

For agencies managing large producer networks, automated tracking turns background compliance from a reactive administrative task into a structured compliance workflow that supports faster onboarding and stronger regulatory oversight.

Best Practices for Agencies, Carriers and MGAs

Agencies, carriers, and MGAs can manage insurance licensing background checks more effectively by implementing structured compliance workflows that standardize how background screenings, disclosures, and regulatory documentation are tracked. Organizations that rely on centralized records reduce the risk of delays, missed disclosures, and audit findings.

The following best practices help licensing teams maintain strong producer licensing compliance while improving onboarding efficiency.

Centralized Documentation Repository

Licensing teams should maintain a centralized repository for all documents related to insurance licensing background checks.

A centralized documentation system should include:

• Fingerprinting confirmation receipts
• Disclosure explanations submitted during licensing eligibility reviews
• Court documentation or financial records requested by regulators
• Regulatory correspondence with state Departments of Insurance

Centralized storage improves visibility and allows compliance teams to retrieve documentation quickly during audits.

State Rule Tracking Matrix

Because state insurance background check requirements vary, agencies should maintain a structured rule matrix that tracks fingerprinting and disclosure rules across jurisdictions.

A compliance matrix typically includes:

• States requiring fingerprint-based background checks
• States that rely primarily on disclosure reviews
• Approved fingerprint vendors for each jurisdiction
• Additional documentation requirements for criminal history insurance license reviews
• Estimated background screening timelines by state

Maintaining a rule matrix allows licensing teams to plan onboarding timelines more accurately and avoid delays caused by incomplete application submissions.

Automate Reminders and Alerts

Background compliance often requires multiple follow-ups with applicants, fingerprint vendors, and regulators. Automated reminders help ensure that key steps in the NIPR background check process are completed on time.

Automated alerts can notify teams when:

• Fingerprint appointments need to be scheduled
• Documentation requests are incomplete
• State regulators request additional disclosure information
• Application reviews exceed expected processing timelines

These alerts help licensing managers intervene early before delays impact operations.

Background Review Checklists for Onboarding

A structured checklist ensures that every step of the insurance regulatory screening process is completed before the producer begins selling insurance products.

Background Check Compliance Checklist for Agencies

The following checklist is a starting point for agency compliance. Compliance processes for each state may include additional steps.

The background check compliance checklist includes but is not limited to the following:

☐ Submit the license application through the NIPR system

☐ Verify the state’s background check requirement

☐ Confirm whether fingerprinting is required

☐ Schedule and complete fingerprint submission

☐ Review all criminal history disclosures

☐ Upload any required supporting documents

☐ Track background screening status with the state DOI

☐ Store records in the producer compliance file

☐ Confirm background clearance before appointments

Structured onboarding processes help agencies maintain consistent compliance across large producer networks.

Audit Trail Retention and Recordkeeping

Regulatory audits require organizations to demonstrate that background screenings were completed during the licensing process. Agencies should retain records that show how insurance licensing background checks were conducted and how disclosures were evaluated.

Important audit trail records may include:

• Fingerprint submission confirmations
• Background screening status reports
• Disclosure investigation documentation
• Licensing eligibility review decisions

Maintaining these records allows organizations to respond quickly during regulatory examinations.

Integration with License and Appointment Management

Background screening should not operate in isolation from licensing and appointment workflows. Integrating insurance licensing background checks with license tracking systems allows compliance teams to monitor the entire producer lifecycle from initial screening to appointment approval.

When background screening data integrates with licensing and appointment management systems, agencies gain better visibility into how regulatory eligibility affects onboarding timelines and multi-state licensing compliance.

Expert Insight: Background Compliance Is Operational Infrastructure

For agencies operating across multiple states, background compliance should be treated as operational infrastructure rather than administrative overhead. Organizations that manage these processes through centralized systems and standardized workflows gain greater control over licensing timelines, reduce compliance risk, and maintain stronger regulatory documentation as their producer networks grow.

How Agencies Simplify Background Compliance at Scale

Agencies simplify insurance licensing background checks at scale by replacing fragmented tracking methods with centralized compliance systems. As producer networks grow, manual tracking through spreadsheets and email quickly becomes chaotic. But a structured compliance platform allows licensing teams to track background screening requirements alongside licensing and appointment workflows.

Large agencies often manage dozens or hundreds of producers across several states. Each application may require different state insurance background check requirements, fingerprint vendors, disclosure reviews, and documentation requests. Without centralized visibility, licensing managers must manually verify each step of the NIPR background check process, increasing the risk of onboarding delays.

Key capabilities that simplify background compliance include:

• Automated tracking dashboards that show the status of every producer’s background screening and licensing application
• Real-time compliance alerts when fingerprint submissions, disclosures, or regulatory reviews require action
• Multi-state rule visibility to help licensing teams understand different fingerprinting requirements across jurisdictions
• Centralized documentation storage for fingerprint confirmations, disclosure explanations, and regulatory correspondence
• Audit-ready reporting that documents the full insurance regulatory screening process for each producer

These capabilities allow licensing managers to identify stalled applications, incomplete documentation, or missing fingerprint submissions before they delay onboarding timelines. This visibility significantly improves multi-state licensing compliance and reduces operational risk.

Agenzee is a specialized insurance license and carrier appointment management platform that helps agencies, carriers and MGAs automate compliance workflows. With real-time tracking, NIPR integration and multi-state visibility, Agenzee reduces licensing delays, prevents lapses and improves onboarding efficiency.

By consolidating background screening, licensing compliance, and regulatory documentation into one system, agencies can transform insurance licensing background checks from a manual administrative task into a streamlined compliance workflow that supports faster producer onboarding.

Why Insurance Licensing Background Checks Matter for Compliance and Agency Growth

Insurance licensing background checks remain one of the most important regulatory safeguards in the producer licensing process. State regulators rely on these screenings to verify that individuals entering the insurance industry meet legal standards for trustworthiness, financial responsibility, and professional conduct.

For agencies, carriers, and MGAs, insurance licensing background checks serve as the first compliance checkpoint before a producer can begin selling insurance products.

Beyond regulatory requirements, background screening has direct operational consequences for agencies. Delays during the NIPR background check process, incomplete disclosures, or inconsistent tracking can slow producer onboarding and create compliance exposure.

Organizations that rely on manual tracking struggle to maintain visibility in these processes. Spreadsheets and email chains can make it difficult to monitor background screening progress or quickly respond to regulator requests. As producer networks expand and agencies pursue multi-state licensing compliance, these manual workflows become increasingly difficult to manage.

Centralized compliance platforms allow agencies to monitor background screening requirements, maintain audit-ready records, and track regulatory eligibility across their entire producer network. By integrating background compliance into licensing and appointment management workflows, agencies can reduce onboarding delays while maintaining stronger regulatory oversight.

Ready to streamline background compliance and licensing operations? Book your Licensing Strategy Demo today.

Share this blog on